Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I PZP 2/06 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request to depart from legal precedent regarding res judicata in partial judgment scenarios.

Case Number I PZP 2/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court refused to adopt a new legal interpretation regarding the scope of res judicata after a lower court requested a departure from an existing precedent. The plaintiff sought to relitigate identical claims for worker compensation after a final judgment had already awarded the full amount requested. The court determined that the procedural request was futile because the underlying statute had been repealed, and the existing precedent did not apply to the specific circumstances of a full rather than partial dismissal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 62 § 2 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 listopada 2002 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym; Art. 31 ustawy z dnia 15 lutego 1962 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym: A request to depart from a binding legal precedent is inadmissible if the statute it interprets has been repealed, and the precedent's scope does not cover the specific situation of a full rather than partial dismissal of claims.

Keywords

AI generated
res judicata legal precedent Supreme Court procedural request worker compensation partial dismissal statutory repeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 31 of the Act of 15 February 1962 on the Supreme Court
Art. 62 § 2 of the Act of 23 November 2002 on the Supreme Court
Art. 199 § 1 point 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 4771 § 1 k.p.c
art. 366 k.p.c
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 475 § 1 k.p.c
art. 4771 § 2 k.p.c
art. 56 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Judgment of 30 May 1966, III PZP 15/66
Judgment of 4 October 1966, II PR 123/66
Judgment of 14 November 1979, IV PR 322/79
Judgment of 15 July 1969, II CR 246/69
Judgment of 16 August 2005, I PK 11/05
Judgment of 17 January 1997, I PKN 59/96
III CRN 223/73
I PK 11/05
Supreme Court dismisses unemployment pay claim when employee receives disability pension for same period.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text