I UZ 13/06
AI generated
Appeal dismissed because vacation travel justified missing deadline; lower court erred in finding fault.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's decision rejecting an appeal filed late due to vacation travel. The appellant argued that her absence from her residence during summer holidays prevented timely receipt of the judgment, which was only delivered to her mother-in-law. The court held that such travel justifies a missed deadline if service occurred after the substitute service date, and the lower court improperly found the appellant at fault without evidence.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 138 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 373 k.p.c.; Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.: Traveling away from one's residence during vacation constitutes a valid excuse for missing a procedural deadline if actual service occurred after substitute service.
Keywords
AI generated
procedural deadline
vacation travel
substitute service
appellate review
civil procedure code
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 138 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 373 k.p.c.
Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 299 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 16 k.p.c.
art. 138 § 1 k.p.c
art. 373 k.p.c
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c
art. 168 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII CKN 1118/98
III CZP 77/67