II BP 11/06
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; court costs payment does not constitute established damage under Art. 4245 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's complaint regarding the legality of a final judgment. The appellant claimed the judgment caused damage by ordering him to pay court costs and threatening future liability, but the court found no causal link between the judgment and these losses. The court ruled that merely being ordered to pay costs does not constitute established damage under the relevant statute, as the obligation to pay arises only after the order is issued, not from the judgment itself.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 4241 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 4245 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c.: A complaint for annulment requires established damage; mere obligation to pay court costs ordered in a judgment does not constitute such damage.
Keywords
AI generated
complaint for annulment
established damage
court costs
causal link
final judgment
material liability
procedural law
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 4241 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 4241 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 4245 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c.
Art. 361 § 1 k.c.
Art. 108 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 1 pkt 9 k.p.c.
Art. 4248 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 4248 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 4245 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c
art. 117 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedpostanowienie Sąd Najwyższy z dnia 14 września 1962 r., II CZ 86/62, OSNCP 1963 nr 12, poz. 267
postanowienie Sąd Najwyższy z dnia 17 listopada 2005 r., II CNP 15/05, OSNC 2006 nr 9, poz. 153
II CNP 2/06
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for non-compliance with specific legal argumentation requirements under Polish Civil Procedure Code.
I CNP 4/06
Supreme Court dismissed citizen ombudsman's complaint for non-use of appeal due to lack of exceptional circumstances.
II CNP 15/05
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against final costs ruling as it is not a final judgment on the main case.