Supreme Court rules on whether a hospital director's on-call duty qualifies for paid standby or unsupervised duty.

The Supreme Court partially revoked the lower court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claim regarding unpaid on-call duties. The plaintiff, a hospital director, argued that his 'on-call' duties constituted paid standby time under health facility law, while the lower court initially dismissed this based on labor code provisions. The court determined that the nature of the director's role involves administrative oversight rather than purely medical readiness, meaning compensation depends on whether the specific duty was strictly medical or managerial in nature.