Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SK 8/06 AI generated

Polish Supreme Court dismissed appeal, ruling copyright society's hologram cost demand violated competition law.

Case Number III SK 8/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the copyright society's cassation appeal against the competition authority's decision. The society argued that requiring licensees to pay hologram costs violated contract law, but the court found this practice constituted an abuse of dominant position. The court ruled that forcing additional costs unrelated to the core licensing subject matter violates the principle of contractual equivalence and freedom of contract.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 8 ust. 1; Art. 8 ust. 2 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów: Requiring a licensee to bear costs for hologramming, unrelated to the core subject of the licensing agreement, constitutes an abuse of dominant position and violates the principle of contractual equivalence.

Keywords

AI generated
abuse of dominant position competition law violation licensing agreement terms contractual equivalence principle freedom of contract copyright society practice unrelated additional costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
Art. 8 ust. 2 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text