Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 317/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; contract severance not protected by Labor Code as not equivalent to wages.

Case Number II PK 317/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a labor court ruling that rejected a claim for severance pay. The employee had voluntarily waived the severance in his resignation letter, which the lower court held was valid as the payment was a contractual bonus rather than statutory wages. The court ruled that since the severance did not fulfill the protective function of wages under the Labor Code, the employee's waiver was not subject to the prohibition against waiving wage rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 84 k.p.; Art. 9 § 1 k.p.; Art. 353 § 1 k.c.; Art. 300 k.p.; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.: A contractual severance payment lacking the characteristics of wages and not serving a protective function similar to wages does not fall under the protective scope of the Labor Code, and a voluntary waiver of such a payment is legally effective.

Keywords

AI generated
contractual severance pay Labor Code protection waiver of rights wages definition cassation appeal dismissal employee resignation protective function

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 84 k.p.
Art. 9 § 1 k.p.
Art. 353 § 1 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 9 § 1 k.p
art. 52 k.p
art. 61 § 1 k.c
art. 87 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text