Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III PK 22/06 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; labor court cannot set salary within statutory limits if regulations exist.

Case Number III PK 22/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding her claim for equal pay as a lawyer. The lower court found that the plaintiff was employed on a legal advisor position with a salary range defined by internal regulations and labor laws. The court ruled that it cannot establish a higher salary when the actual pay falls within the statutory and regulatory limits for that role. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the legal issue concerned the interpretation of existing wage regulations rather than a violation of equal treatment principles.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 224 ust. 1 ustawy o radcach prawnych; Art. 39814 k.p.c.: The labor court cannot determine a salary for a legal advisor if the amount paid falls within the ranges prescribed by labor law and regulations, as such determination exceeds the scope of cassation review.

Keywords

AI generated
labor law salary regulation equal pay cassation appeal legal advisor wage limits statutory provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 224 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
art. 262 § 2 pkt 1 k.p
art. 18 k.p
art. 771 k.p
art. 772 k.p
art. 29 § 1 k.p
art. 113 k.p
art. 415 k.c
art. 300 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PK 58/02
I PK 171/02
Supreme Court remands labor dispute regarding unequal pay for legal counsel positions to lower court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text