I PK 213/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; part-time teacher's dismissal based on Art. 42 Labor Code, not Art. 20 Teacher's Charter.

Case Number I PK 213/05

Court / Authority Sąd Najwyższy

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2006-05-16

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a part-time art teacher seeking reinstatement. The lower court found that the employer's reduction of working hours was governed by Article 42 of the Labor Code, not Article 20 of the Teacher's Charter, which applies only to full-time staff. The court ruled that the employer's legal basis for the dismissal was irrelevant and that the school's restructuring to hire a specialist in plastic art justified the change.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 20 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. - Karta Nauczyciela; Art. 42 k.p.: The provision in the Teacher's Charter regarding dismissal applies exclusively to teachers employed in full working capacity, whereas changes to contracts for part-time teachers are governed by the Labor Code.

Keywords

AI generated

part-time teacher Labor Code dismissal Teacher's Charter scope working hours reduction cassation appeal dismissal school restructuring qualification mismatch

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 20 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. - Karta Nauczyciela

Art. 42 k.p.

Art. 93 ust. 1 Karty Nauczyciela

Art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c.

Art. 39814 k.p.c.

art. 42 k.p

art. 92 ust. 1 Konstytucji

art. 42 § 2 k.p

art. 42 § 1 k.p

art. 30 § 4 k.p

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; part-time teacher's dismissal based on Art. 42 Labor Code, not Art. 20 Teacher's Charter.

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text