Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UA 1/06 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; pre-retirement benefit overpayment must be calculated on total annual amount only.

Case Number II UA 1/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed Urszula K.'s appeal against the Social Insurance Institution's order to repay an overpaid pre-retirement benefit. The insured argued that suspended monthly payments should be included in the annual calculation, but the court held that only the total amount paid during the fiscal year matters. The decision rests on the statutory requirement for annual reconciliation and the finding that the insured was adequately informed of these rules.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 6 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy o świadczeniach przedemerytalnych; Art. 6 ust. 5 ustawy o świadczeniach przedemerytalnych; Art. 138 ust. 1 i ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z FUS: The total amount of a pre-retirement benefit paid in a fiscal year is the sole basis for determining overpayment liability, regardless of monthly suspensions.

Keywords

AI generated
pre-retirement benefit overpayment liability fiscal year reconciliation social insurance law annual calculation duty to inform repayment obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 6 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 30 kwietnia 2004 r. o świadczeniach przedemerytalnych
Art. 6 ust. 5 ustawy z dnia 30 kwietnia 2004 r. o świadczeniach przedemerytalnych
Art. 138 ust. 1 i ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z FUS
Art. 385 k.p.c.
Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 385 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text