Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 264/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; bankruptcy trustee's duty is answering questions, not proactive information disclosure.

Case Number II PK 264/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the bankruptcy trustee's cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that reinstated an employee's contract. The employee argued the trustee failed to provide information about a shareholder meeting, claiming this violated bankruptcy laws. The court held that the statutory duty to provide 'necessary explanations' strictly covers answering specific questions and does not mandate proactive disclosure of information.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 18 § 2 of the Bankruptcy Law; The obligation to provide necessary explanations to the trustee and court commissioner refers to answering posed questions and does not encompass the duty to provide information on one's own initiative.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy trustee duties necessary explanations proactive information disclosure cassation appeal dismissal employment contract reinstatement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 18 § 2 of the Bankruptcy Law
Art. 393 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 k.p
art. 52 k.p
art. 58 k.c
art. 39312 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text