II PZP 1/06 AI generated

Appeal by lawyer rejected without notice only for defects in specific points of Art. 368 § 1 CPC.

Case Number II PZP 1/06

Court / Authority Sąd Najwyższy

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2006-04-19

Outcome Partially Allowed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding the rejection of an appeal filed by a lawyer without prior notice of defects. The appellant argued that the lower court incorrectly applied Article 3701 of the Civil Procedure Code to dismiss the appeal for failing to name the opposing party, a requirement not listed in the specific defects enumerated in Article 368 § 1. The court held that the statute refers exclusively to the specific defects listed in points 1-3 and 5 of that article, excluding general formal requirements like naming the party.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 3701 k.p.c.; Art. 368 § 1 k.p.c.: An appeal by a lawyer is rejected without notice of defects only if it fails to meet the specific structural requirements explicitly listed in points 1-3 and 5 of Article 368 § 1 of the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated

Civil Procedure Code appeal rejection defects in appeal lawyer representative notice of defects procedural requirements specific defects

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 3701 k.p.c.

Art. 368 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 3984 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 3986 § 2 k.c.

Art. 3986 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 3986 § 2 in fine k.p.c.

Art. 367 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 3981 § 1 k.p.c.

art. 3701 k.p.c

art. 368 § 1 k.p.c

Appeal by lawyer rejected without notice only for defects in specific points of Art. 368 § 1 CPC.

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text