Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II PK 135/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling that a council's silence on a dismissal consent is deemed consent.

Case Number II PK 135/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal, sending the case back for a new ruling on costs. The plaintiff sought reinstatement after being dismissed from a healthcare facility, arguing the dismissal was invalid. The Court held that the municipal council's failure to respond within 30 days to the mayor's proposal to dismiss the employee constituted implied consent to the termination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 67 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 44 ust. 2 ustawy o zakładach opieki zdrowotnej; Art. 80a ustawy o samorządzie województwa; Art. 25 ust. 2 ustawy o samorządzie gminnym: The failure of a municipal council to express consent or dissent within the statutory period following the submission of a project to dismiss an employee is deemed equivalent to expressing consent to the termination of the employment relationship.

Keywords

AI generated
implied consent municipal council dismissal procedure statutory period employment termination healthcare facility cassation appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 67 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 44 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 30 sierpnia 1991 r. o zakładach opieki zdrowotnej
Art. 80a ustawy o samorządzie województwa
Art. 25 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 8 marca 1990 r. o samorządzie gminnym
art. 67 § 1 k.p.c
art. 45 k.p
art. 460 k.p.c
art. 379 pkt 5 k.p.c
art. 45 § 1 k.p
art. 3 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PZP 55/92 (OSNC 1993 nr 7-8, poz. 116)

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text