III PK 8/06
AI generated
Criminal appeal dismissed because cassation complaints regarding fact-finding and evidence evaluation are inadmissible under Polish law.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against a lower court's judgment in a civil compensation case. The defendant argued procedural violations, but the court held that cassation complaints concerning the establishment of facts or the evaluation of evidence are explicitly excluded by statute. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because it lacked a valid legal basis for review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 3981 § 2 k.p.c.: Cassation complaints based solely on the establishment of facts or the evaluation of evidence are inadmissible as they fall outside the scope of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction as a court of law.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation appeal inadmissibility
fact-finding exclusion
evidence evaluation review
Supreme Court jurisdiction
procedural law limitations
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 3981 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 183 ust. 1 Konstytucji
Art. 3983 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 8 k.p
art. 13 k.p
art. 18 k.p
art. 78 § 1 k.p
art. 300 k.p
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PK 80/04
Supreme Court held that authority to sign employment contracts does not authorize non-compete agreements post-employment termination.
III CSK 13/05
Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal based solely on facts or evidence evaluation as inadmissible under new Civil Procedure Code.
I PK 453/02
Non-compete clause invalid without explicit time limit; employer failed to define duration in employment contract.