Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 103/05 AI generated

Social security late fees of 200% pre-2003 law upheld despite tax code conflict.

Case Number II UK 103/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding social security late fees, upholding the 200% penalty rate applicable before January 2003. The appellant argued that the tax code's 2002 amendment created a legal gap or conflict invalidating the fee calculation, while the court found this to be a mere collision of regulations rather than a legislative void. The court ruled that the clear statutory basis for the fee rate and the competent authority's power to set the base rate provided sufficient legal ground, rejecting the claim of unconstitutional ambiguity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 23 ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych; art. 56 § 1 Ordynacji podatkowej; Art. 12 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy o Narodowym Banku Polskim: A collision between tax code provisions and banking law does not invalidate a penalty rate if the competent authority has clearly defined the base rate and the obligation remains legally certain.

Keywords

AI generated
social security late fees tax code collision 200 percent penalty rate legal gap argument competent authority power statutory interpretation constitutional review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 23 ust. 1 of the Social Security System Act of 13 October 1998
Art. 56 § 1 of the Tax Procedure Act of 29 August 1997
Art. 12 ust. 2 pkt 1 of the Act on the National Bank of Poland of 29 August 1997
art. 10 Konstytucji
art. 7 Konstytucji
art. 39814 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CZP 37/91
III SA 120/03

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text