II PK 154/05
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses equal pay claim where CEO duties are shared, preventing objective work comparison.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding equal pay and a monetary equivalent for vacation leave. The court found that the plaintiff, as CEO, shared management duties with another executive, meaning his work did not objectively match the defendant's other employees. Consequently, the court ruled that the statutory requirement for equal pay could not be applied because the specific job functions were not identical or repeatable in a way that allowed for fair comparison.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 112 k.p.; Art. 183c k.p.: The principle of equal pay for equal work does not apply when a position involves shared management duties, as this prevents the objective verification of comparable work.
Keywords
AI generated
equal pay principle
shared management duties
objective work comparison
cassation appeal dismissal
labor law standards
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 112 k.p.
Art. 183c k.p.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
art. 112 k.p
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 39311 § 2 k.p.c
art. 39312 k.p.c
art. 98 k.p.c