Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SZP 1/06 AI generated

Court rules Consumer Protection Court issues ruling, not judgment, after hearing; appeal barred.

Case Number III SZP 1/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding whether the Consumer Protection Court should issue a judgment or a ruling after a hearing. The appellant argued for a formal judgment, while the court noted the procedural nature of the decision. The court held that since the ruling does not conclude the administrative proceedings, it is not appealable under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 479 § 57 pkt 2 k.p.c.; Art. 394 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 176 ust. 1 k.r.s.: A ruling issued by the Consumer Protection Court after a hearing following an appeal against an administrative order does not conclude the proceedings and is therefore not subject to appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
Consumer Protection Court ruling vs judgment administrative proceedings appeal admissibility Code of Civil Procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 479 § 57 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 176 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 78 Konstytucji
Art. 85 ust. 1 Prawa telekomunikacyjnego
Art. 96 ust. 4 Prawa telekomunikacyjnego
art. 47957 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 123 k.p
art. 126 k.p
art. 233 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CRN 120/91
III CRN 129/91
III CZP 27/71

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text