II PK 211/05
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; employee breach of duty by joining competitor without consent.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against a lower court's decision awarding him damages. The employee argued he did not violate competition laws because his new battery production began only after the employer ceased that specific activity. The court ruled that joining a competing company as a manager without consent constitutes a breach of the duty of care, regardless of the timing of the new business relative to the employer's operations.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 100 § 2 pkt 4 k.p.; Art. 211 § 1 k.s.h.: An employee-manager violates the duty of care by secretly joining a competing company as a manager without the employer's consent, even if the competing activity commenced after the employer ceased similar operations.
Keywords
AI generated
duty of care
conflict of interest
non-compete clause
employee manager
breach of contract
cassation appeal
loyalty obligation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 100 § 2 pkt 4 k.p.
Art. 211 § 1 k.s.h.
Art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.
Art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 100 § 2 pkt 4 k.p
art. 211 § 1 k.s.h
art. 210 § 1 k.s.h
art. 52 § 1 k.p
art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 k.p