Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PK 114/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; collective agreement termination by employee does not violate equal treatment principle.

Case Number III PK 114/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee seeking higher severance pay. The employee argued that receiving less than those fired by the employer violated equal treatment principles under the Labor Code and Constitution. The court ruled that objective differences in initiative for termination justify varying compensation levels without constituting discrimination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 59 ust. 2 i 4 Konstytucji; art. 9 § 1 k.p.; Art. 112 i 113 k.p.: A collective agreement terminating employment by employee's initiative is a source of labor law, and lower compensation for such cases does not violate equal treatment due to objective factual differences.

Keywords

AI generated
collective agreement termination employee initiative equal treatment principle labor severance pay discrimination in compensation cassation appeal dismissal objective justification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 59 ust. 2 i 4 Konstytucji
art. 9 § 1 k.p.
art. 112 i art. 113 k.p.
art. 6 ust. 4 lit. d w związku z art. 9 u.z.p.
art. 9 ust. 2 układu zbiorowego pracy
art. 1 dyrektywy 98/59 WE
art. 141 ust. 1-3 TWE
art. 9 § 1 k.p
art. 113 k.p
art. 9 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text