Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PZ 14/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal on labor dispute value, citing Art. 231 k.p.c. instead of Art. 22 k.p.c.

Case Number III PZ 14/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court's decision rejecting the plaintiffs' claim to restore previous wage conditions. The plaintiffs sought reinstatement of bonuses and seniority allowances after their indefinite-term employment contracts were partially terminated by the employer. The court ruled that the correct legal basis for determining the dispute value is Article 231 of the Code of Civil Procedure, not Article 22, and upheld the lower court's finding that the individual claim values did not meet the threshold for cassation review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 231 k.p.c.; Art. 22 k.p.c.: In labor disputes regarding the validity of contract termination, the value of the dispute is determined under Article 231 of the Code of Civil Procedure, not Article 22, and the scope of cassation review is limited to the value specified by the lower court.

Keywords

AI generated
labor dispute value cassation review threshold Code of Civil Procedure employment contract termination wage condition restoration

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 231 k.p.c.
Art. 22 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 231 k.p.c
art. 22 k.p.c
art. 22 k.p
art. 3982 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3986 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text