Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PZ 13/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on withdrawal of appeal in labor case, ruling it does not violate employee's legitimate interest.

Case Number III PZ 13/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal regarding the withdrawal of a cassation appeal and the associated power of attorney. The lower court had rejected the cassation, arguing that since the appeal was withdrawn, it no longer existed, while the plaintiff claimed the withdrawal violated his legitimate interest due to lack of consultation with his lawyer. The court held that unlike civil cases, labor law allows for a narrow exception where withdrawal violates the employee's legitimate interest, but the plaintiff's subjective disagreements with his lawyer's strategy did not constitute such a violation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 355 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 6 k.p.c.; Art. 394 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 469 k.p.c.: Withdrawal of a cassation appeal in labor law cases does not automatically violate the employee's legitimate interest unless specific objective circumstances demonstrate a breach of the employee's rights.

Keywords

AI generated
labor law cassation withdrawal of appeal legitimate interest power of attorney employee rights civil procedure code supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 355 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 6 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 469 k.p.c.
Art. 3 of the Act of 22 December 2004 on amending the Civil Procedure Code
art. 469 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 355 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text