Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZ 78/05 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes appeal dismissal due to improper service of documents and lack of valid power of attorney.

Case Number II UZ 78/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court overturned the appellate court's decision to dismiss the applicant's request for restoring a deadline and serving judgment documents. The applicant argued that the lawyer lacked authority for the appeal stage and that service was invalid because the business address was defunct. The court ruled that the lower court erred in applying service rules to a non-residential address and failed to verify the lawyer's continued mandate.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 91, 92 k.p.c.; Art. 136 § 1, 2 k.p.c.; Art. 133 ust. 3 k.p.c.; Art. 370 k.p.c.; Art. 387 k.p.c.: A limitation of power of attorney to a specific instance does not authorize representation in subsequent proceedings, and service of process to a business address is invalid if the business no longer exists at that location.

Keywords

AI generated
power of attorney scope service of process rules business address validity deadline restoration appellate procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 91 k.p.c.
Art. 92 k.p.c.
Art. 65 k.c.
Art. 136 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 136 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 133 ust. 3 k.p.c.
Art. 139 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 370 k.p.c.
Art. 387 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CZP 148/94

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text