II PK 122/05
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling dismissal for lost 'clean opinion' is invalid without proven misconduct.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal, ordering the employer to reinstate the plaintiff as a municipal guard. The plaintiff was dismissed for losing a 'clean opinion' due to a criminal investigation and unauthorized work, but the court found no evidence of misconduct. The court held that dismissal based on mere suspicion or press rumors violates social norms and the special protection afforded to councilors.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 pkt 5 ustawy o strażach gminnych; Art. 14 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy o pracownikach samorządowych: A dismissal for loss of a clean opinion is invalid if the employee was not criminally convicted and the action violates social norms.
Keywords
AI generated
municipal guard dismissal
clean opinion requirement
social norms violation
councilor protection
unjustified termination
criminal investigation impact
reinstatement of employment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 24 pkt 5 ustawy z dnia 29 sierpnia 1997 r. o strażach gminnych
Art. 14 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 22 marca 1990 r. o pracownikach samorządowych
Art. 22 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 5 czerwca 1998 r. o samorządzie powiatowym
Art. 45 § 2 i 3 k.p.
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Art. 32 i 33 ustawy z dnia 29 sierpnia 1997 r. o strażach gminnych
art. 263 § 2 k.k
art. 386 § 1 k.p.c
art. 57 § 2 k.p