I PZ 22/05
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for lack of legal standing and missed deadlines under Civil Procedure Code.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeals against the Regional Court's rulings, finding them procedurally inadmissible. The plaintiff personally filed an appeal after the case was finalized, while the appointed lawyer's appeal was submitted months after the deadline expired. The court ruled that neither appeal met the strict statutory requirements for filing a cassation appeal to the Supreme Court.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 3941 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c.: Appeals against final rulings to the Supreme Court are inadmissible if the appealed decision does not conclude the proceedings or if the appeal is filed outside the prescribed time limits.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation appeal
missed deadline
legal standing
appointed counsel
Civil Procedure Code
procedural inadmissibility
final ruling
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 373 k.p.c.
Art. 370 k.p.c.
Art. 39821 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 3941 § 2 k.p.c
art. 871 k.p.c
art. 387 § 1 k.p.c
art. 387 § 3 k.p.c
art. 391 k.p.c