III SZP 4/05
AI generated
Monopoly Act start date is end of year when contract imposing burdensome terms is signed.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court ruled that the procedural deadline for initiating antimonopoly proceedings begins at the end of the year in which a contract imposing burdensome terms is concluded. The Court found the lower court's interpretation flawed because it incorrectly suggested the start date was the moment the contract was signed. The decision clarifies that the timeline triggers only after the calendar year closes, ensuring proper procedural timing for enforcement.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 5 ust. 1 pkt 6 ustawy z dnia 24 lutego 1990 r. o przeciwdziałaniu praktykom monopolistycznym; Art. 21 ust. 1 tej ustawy: The period for initiating antimonopoly proceedings commences at the end of the year in which the contract imposing burdensome terms is concluded.
Keywords
AI generated
antimonopoly proceedings
burdensome terms
monopoly position
procedural deadline
contract conclusion
dominant position
enforcement timeline
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 5 ust. 1 pkt 6 ustawy z dnia 24 lutego 1990 r. o przeciwdziałaniu praktykom monopolistycznym i ochronie interesów konsumentów
Art. 21 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 24 lutego 1990 r. o przeciwdziałaniu praktykom monopolistycznym i ochronie interesów konsumentów
Art. 61 § 1 ustawy o Sądzie Najwyższym
art. 217 § 2 k.p.c
art. 65 § 2 k.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 39311 § 1 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI CKN 257/01