III SPP 145/05
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses second delay complaint due to applicant's procedural errors and delayed actions.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's second complaint regarding procedural delay in labor proceedings. The applicant argued that the appeal remained unresolved for over a year, but the court found that his initial defective filing and subsequent procedural delays contributed to the timeline. Consequently, the court ruled that the proceedings were not unreasonably prolonged because the applicant's own conduct shortened the relevant assessment period.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 2 ust. 2 ustawy o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki; The court must consider the applicant's own procedural errors and delaying actions when assessing whether proceedings have been unreasonably prolonged.
Keywords
AI generated
procedural delay
second complaint
unreasonable delay
applicant conduct
labor proceedings
defective filing
assessment period
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 2 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 17 czerwca 2004 r. o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki
art. 12 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 17 czerwca 2004 r. o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII SPP 52/05
III SPP 128/05