Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III PK 94/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; four-year pre-retirement protection applies only to dismissals effective after June 1, 2004.

Case Number III PK 94/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding a termination of her employment contract with a school. The lower court found that the employer's dismissal, effective May 12, 2004, did not violate the four-year pre-retirement protection period because the new law extending this period to four years only became effective on June 1, 2004. The court clarified that the protection period begins from the date the dismissal becomes effective, not from the date the notice was issued, meaning the four-year rule did not apply to this specific termination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 39 k.p.; Art. 13 ustawy o świadczeniach przedemerytalnych; The four-year protection period for pre-retirement employees applies only to dismissals effective on or after the date the extended period commenced, not to dismissals issued prior to that date.

Keywords

AI generated
pre-retirement protection termination of employment effective date of dismissal notice period calculation labor law amendment cassation appeal dismissal validity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 39 k.p.
Art. 13 ustawy z dnia 30 kwietnia 2004 r. o świadczeniach przedemerytalnych
Art. 20 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. - Karta Nauczyciela
Art. 30 § 4 k.p.
Art. 943 k.p.
Art. 61 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 39 k.p
art. 30 § 4 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text