Supreme Court dismisses appeal against judge's retirement rights loss due to false declaration. The court rules the law applies to all judges regardless of timing. The decision upholds the statutory provision for loss of rights. The court rejects arguments regarding procedural timing and scope. The ruling confirms the law applies universally to all judges. The judgment affirms the statutory basis for the penalty. The court finds the appeal arguments legally unfounded. The decision maintains the original administrative ruling. The court emphasizes the legislative intent of the law.

The Supreme Court dismissed Alicja R.'s appeal against the National Council of the Judiciary's decision to strip her of retirement rights. The Council determined she lost these rights because she made a false declaration regarding work with security organs, a fact established by a final court ruling. The Court rejected her arguments that the law did not apply to retired judges or that the procedural timeline was incorrect, ruling that the statute applies universally to all such declarations. Consequently, the Court upheld the original decision, confirming that the loss of retirement benefits was legally valid and procedurally sound.