Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZP 3/05 AI generated

Supreme Court ruled that a prosecutor's temporary higher-level delegation does not count as work on an equivalent position for pension purposes.

Case Number I PZP 3/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed Urszula M.'s claim for equalization of her pension, ruling that her time spent on a higher-level prosecutor's duties via delegation did not constitute work on an equivalent position. The plaintiff argued that performing higher-ranking tasks should qualify as work on a corresponding post, but the court found she remained formally on her original station. Consequently, the court held that such periods are only counted as service on the formally held position, not as equivalent work.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 62 ust. 1d ustawy o prokuraturze; Art. 183c k.p.: A period of actual performance of duties by a prosecutor in a higher organizational unit via official delegation is not considered work on another appropriately equivalent prosecutorial position.

Keywords

AI generated
prosecutor delegation pension equalization equivalent position service years calculation statutory interpretation organizational hierarchy labor law principles

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 62 ust. 1d ustawy z dnia 20 czerwca 1985 roku o prokuraturze
art. 2 pkt 10 ustawy z dnia 28 listopada 2003 r. o zmianie ustawy - Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych, ustawy o prokuraturze, ustawy - Prawo o ustroju sądów wojskowych oraz niektórych innych ustaw
art. 50 ust. 5 ustawy o prokuraturze
art. 183c k.p.
art. 206 § 2 i § 6 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. - Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych
art. 1864 k.p
art. 173 Konstytucji

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text