II PK 102/05
AI generated
Supreme Court voids prior judgment due to unconstitutional union law provision retroactively invalidating employer consent requirements.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court set aside the lower court's dismissal of the employees' appeal to reinstate them to work. The court found that a Constitutional Court ruling declared the employer's consent requirement for terminating union members unconstitutional as of April 2003. Consequently, the court held that the lower courts erred by failing to apply this new constitutional standard to cases decided after that date.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 190 ust. 3 Konstytucji RP: A normative act declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court loses its binding force immediately, requiring courts to disregard it for all factual situations occurring after the ruling's entry into force.
Keywords
AI generated
unconstitutional norm
retroactive invalidity
union member protection
employer consent
acquired rights
Constitutional Court ruling
labor law supremacy
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 32 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 190 ust. 3 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 32 Konstytucji
art. 47 k.p
art. 8 k.p
art. 45 k.p
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 56 § 1 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedwyrok Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 7 kwietnia 2003 r., P 7/02
wyrok Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 21 października 2004 r., I PK 676/03
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 7 grudnia 2000 r., III ZP 27/00
wyrok Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 5 września 2001 r., II UKN 542/00
I PK 607/03
I PK 676/03
Supreme Court dismissed union committee member's appeal regarding statutory protection loss after Constitutional Court ruling.