I UK 59/05
AI generated
Supreme Court allows appeal overturning lower court ruling on overturning statutory presumption of farming activity.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court partially allowed the cassation appeal, overturning the appellate court's decision that dismissed the insured's claim. The insureds argued they ceased farming activities after transferring their land to their daughters, despite retaining ownership. The court held that the statutory presumption of farming activity under the relevant law is rebuttable by evidence and cannot be treated as a definition of the activity itself.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 38 ust. 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników; Art. 28 ust. 3 i 4 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników: The statutory presumption that a landowner engages in farming activity is rebuttable by contrary evidence and does not equate ownership with actual conduct.
Keywords
AI generated
statutory presumption
farming activity
social insurance
rebuttable presumption
land ownership
agricultural pension
evidence burden
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 38 ust. 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 28 ust. 3 i 4 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
art. 386 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3931 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 39311 § 2 k.p.c
art. 39315 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generateduchwała z dnia 6 maja 2004 r., II UZP 5/04 - OSNP 2004 Nr 22, poz. 389