II PZ 35/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal for failure of lawyer to notify court of office address change.

Case Number II PZ 35/05

Court / Authority Sąd Najwyższy

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2005-10-13

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the lawyer's appeal regarding the validity of service of process. The lower court rejected the appeal because the lawyer failed to notify the court of a change in their office address, and the court deemed the service valid based on a postal note stating the recipient had moved. The court ruled that the lawyer's omission to update the address constituted a breach of duty, and the postal service's action was justified under procedural rules.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 136 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 138 k.p.c.; Art. 139 k.p.c.; Art. 6 k.p.c.: The failure of a professional representative to notify the court of a change of address constitutes a neglect, rendering subsequent service valid if the postal service acts in accordance with statutory procedures.

Keywords

AI generated

service of process change of address professional representative procedural neglect postal service court notification procedural economy

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 136 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 138 k.p.c.

Art. 139 k.p.c.

Art. 6 k.p.c.

§ 10 Rozporządzenia

art. 136 § 1 k.p.c

art. 373 k.p.c

art. 139 k.p.c

art. 135 k.p.c

art. 139 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

II CR 657/70

Supreme Court dismisses appeal for failure of lawyer to notify court of office address change.

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Cited Case Law

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text