Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II PZ 32/05 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal by overturning lower court's rejection due to insufficient formal justification of the request for admission.

Case Number II PZ 32/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court overturned the Regional Court's dismissal of a cassation appeal filed by a plaintiff against KGHM P.M. SA regarding pension and compensation. The lower court rejected the appeal because the request for admission to review lacked a detailed legal justification, arguing that such justification is mandatory under the Civil Procedure Code. However, the Supreme Court determined that the appellant met the formal requirements by citing specific legal issues, reserving the substantive assessment of whether those issues warrant review for the Supreme Court itself.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 3984 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c.; Art. 3989 § 1, 2 k.p.c.: The requirement to separately justify the request for admission to cassation review does not permit the second-instance court to reject the appeal, as the substantive assessment of whether grounds exist for review belongs exclusively to the Supreme Court.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal request for admission justification requirement second instance court Supreme Court competence formal procedural rules Civil Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 3984 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c.
Art. 3989 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 3989 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 39816 k.p.c.
art. 3984 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c
art. 3989 k.p.c
art. 3984 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3983 k.p.c
art. 3983 § 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text