Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 67/05 AI generated

Supreme Court rules temporary residence location for travel allowance purposes regardless of registration duty. Outcome: case remanded for retrial.

Case Number I PK 67/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court remanded the case to the District Court for a retrial regarding travel allowance calculations. The lower court had dismissed the employee's claim, arguing the temporary residence definition did not apply because the employee was registered elsewhere. The Supreme Court clarified that the employer-provided location counts as temporary residence even without formal registration, establishing the legal basis for the allowance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 4 ust. 3 pkt 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Pracy i Polityki Społecznej z dnia 19 grudnia 2002 r.: A location where an employer provides free accommodation and the employee actually resides, even without permanent intent or registration, constitutes temporary residence for travel allowance purposes.

Keywords

AI generated
travel allowance calculation temporary residence definition employee accommodation registration duty exemption travel expense reimbursement labor law interpretation remand for retrial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 4 ust. 3 pkt 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Pracy i Polityki Społecznej z dnia 19 grudnia 2002 r.
art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 78 k.p
art. 25 k.c
art. 29 § 1 pkt 3 k.p
art. 774 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PK 683/03
I I PKN 464/98

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text