I PK 67/05
AI generated
Supreme Court rules temporary residence location for travel allowance purposes regardless of registration duty. Outcome: case remanded for retrial.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court remanded the case to the District Court for a retrial regarding travel allowance calculations. The lower court had dismissed the employee's claim, arguing the temporary residence definition did not apply because the employee was registered elsewhere. The Supreme Court clarified that the employer-provided location counts as temporary residence even without formal registration, establishing the legal basis for the allowance.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 4 ust. 3 pkt 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Pracy i Polityki Społecznej z dnia 19 grudnia 2002 r.: A location where an employer provides free accommodation and the employee actually resides, even without permanent intent or registration, constitutes temporary residence for travel allowance purposes.
Keywords
AI generated
travel allowance calculation
temporary residence definition
employee accommodation
registration duty exemption
travel expense reimbursement
labor law interpretation
remand for retrial
Cited Legislation
AI generated§ 4 ust. 3 pkt 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Pracy i Polityki Społecznej z dnia 19 grudnia 2002 r.
art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 78 k.p
art. 25 k.c
art. 29 § 1 pkt 3 k.p
art. 774 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PK 683/03
I I PKN 464/98