II PK 383/04
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed overtime pay claim for export construction site manager under Art. 135 § 1 k.p.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a lower court ruling awarding overtime compensation. The court found that the plaintiff, a manager of an export construction unit, was not entitled to overtime pay because the employment contract and surrounding circumstances indicated a mutual intent to exclude such benefits. Consequently, the claim was rejected as the statutory conditions for overtime remuneration were not met.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 135 § 1 k.p.; Art. 384 k.p.c.; Art. 393 k.p.c.: The court may not alter a judgment to the detriment of the appellant unless the appellee also appeals, and overtime pay is not due if the parties' intent was to exclude it despite the statutory possibility.
Keywords
AI generated
overtime compensation
export construction site
management position
cassation appeal
reformationis in peius
employment contract
statutory exclusion
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 135 § 1 k.p.
Art. 384 k.p.c.
Art. 393 k.p.c.
art. 135 § 1 k.p
art. 1514 § 1 k.p
art. 80 k.p
art. 134 § 1 k.p
art. 481 § 1 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 382 k.p.c