Supreme Court held the seven-day work readiness deadline is a substantive right not subject to extension under procedural law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court reversed the lower court's dismissal of the employee's claim regarding a missed seven-day deadline to report work readiness. The employee argued the delay was caused by his lawyer failing to inform him of a reinstatement judgment, while the employer contended the delay was attributable to the employee. The court ruled that the deadline is a substantive right governed by material law, meaning procedural extensions do not apply, but the employee can still prove the delay resulted from independent causes.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 48 § 1 k.p.; Art. 168, 169 k.p.c.: The seven-day deadline for reporting readiness to resume work is a substantive right that does not admit of extension under procedural law, though the employee may demonstrate the delay occurred due to causes independent of them.