Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PK 51/05 AI generated

Disability law requires 7-hour workdays; 8-hour agreements are invalid, mandating overtime pay at 1/7 higher rates.

Case Number III PK 51/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claim for overpayment due to an invalid 8-hour work agreement. The plaintiff, a moderately disabled worker, argued that the statutory 7-hour limit rendered the 8-hour contract void, entitling him to overtime pay calculated at a 1/7 premium. The Court agreed that the contract was invalid under disability laws but held that the plaintiff failed to prove he worked more hours than other employees or on Saturdays, thus dismissing the remaining claims.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 15 ust. 2 ustawy o rehabilitacji zawodowej i społecznej oraz zatrudnianiu osób niepełnosprawnych; Art. 18 § 2 k.p.: An employment contract stipulating an 8-hour workday for a moderately disabled employee is invalid as it contravenes the statutory 7-hour limit, requiring overtime remuneration calculated at a 1/7 premium over the agreed rate.

Keywords

AI generated
disability employment law invalid work contract overtime remuneration calculation moderate disability status statutory work hours limit

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 15 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 27 sierpnia 1997 r. o rehabilitacji zawodowej i społecznej oraz zatrudnianiu osób niepełnosprawnych
Art. 18 § 2 k.p.
Art. 133 k.p.
Art. 134 § 12 k.p.
Art. 393 § 11 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 13 k.p.c.
art. 151 k.p
art. 133 k.p
art. 18 § 2 k.p
art. 84 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text