Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II UZP 7/05 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal dismissal for failure to specify claim value in social insurance cases.

Case Number II UZP 7/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court upheld the District Court's dismissal of Anna K.'s appeal against a social insurance award for a work accident. The appellant failed to specify the monetary value of the disputed claim in her appeal, arguing instead that she had addressed the defect by stating the percentage of disability. The Court ruled that while the law requires a monetary valuation, the specific wording of the lower court's order to specify the value 'quantitatively' was ambiguous given the original award was in percentages, yet the general rule for property rights cases still permits dismissal for non-compliance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 368 § 2 k.p.c.; art. 370 k.p.c.: Failure to specify the value of the subject matter of the appeal in a property rights case constitutes a ground for its dismissal.

Keywords

AI generated
social insurance law work accident compensation appeal procedural defects value of subject matter dismissal of appeal property rights cases formal requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 368 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 130 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 370 k.p.c.
art. 19-24 k.p.c.
art. 25 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 368 § 2 k.p.c
art. 130 § 1 k.p.c
art. 370 k.p.c
art. 368 § 1 k.p.c
art. 25 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PZ 58/00
Supreme Court allows labor dispute appeal despite missing appeal value, ruling it does not block proper proceedings.
III UZ 20/04
Vague summons to cure formal defects in appeal prevents rejection if directed at unrepresented party. Appeal dismissed due to unclear court instructions. Court upheld appeal based on procedural fairness.
I PZ 158/02
II CZ 146/66
III CKN 871/98
III CZ 92/98
II UKN 553/98
Supreme Court allows appeal reinstatement when a party's confused letter indicates total misunderstanding of procedural defects.
III CRN 256/72
I PK 268/02
II UK 396/03
Supreme Court quashes pension decision for failing to recognize late appeal as formal objection.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text