Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 288/04 AI generated

Missing employee claim list deadline does not bar payment from the Employee Guarantee Fund.

Case Number I PK 288/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland overturned the lower court's dismissal of a lawsuit by employees against the Employee Guarantee Fund. The employees argued that the employer failed to submit a supplementary list of unpaid claims immediately after terminating employment, yet they sought payment for wages and severance. The court ruled that the vague 'immediately' deadline for submitting this list cannot extinguish the right to claim non-expired benefits, as no specific statute defines such a strict timeframe. Consequently, the court held that minor procedural delays do not justify denying payment from the Fund, emphasizing the protective purpose of the law over formalistic requirements.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 7 ust. 1a ustawy z dnia 29 grudnia 1993 r. o ochronie roszczeń pracowniczych w razie niewypłacalności pracodawcy; The failure to submit a supplementary list of employee claims within a vague 'immediate' deadline does not preclude the payment of non-expired employee benefits from the Guarantee Fund.

Keywords

AI generated
Employee Guarantee Fund Unpaid employee claims Procedural deadline Labor law protection Supplementary claim list Non-expired benefits Formalistic requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 7 ust. 1a ustawy z dnia 29 grudnia 1993 r. o ochronie roszczeń pracowniczych w razie niewypłacalności pracodawcy
Art. 7 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 29 grudnia 1993 r. o ochronie roszczeń pracowniczych w razie niewypłacalności pracodawcy
Art. 13 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 29 grudnia 1993 r. o ochronie roszczeń pracowniczych w razie niewypłacalności pracodawcy
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 5 k.c
art. 2 Konstytucji

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text