Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SO 12/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal against non-examination ruling as appeal law prohibits further appeals after such rulings.

Case Number III SO 12/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a ruling to leave his complaint on procedural delay without examination. The appellant argued he was unaware of the proceedings due to his prison confinement and relied on the date of service for his deadline. The court held that the specific statute governing complaints on delay does not provide for further appeals against rulings issued after the initial complaint is processed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki; Further appeals against rulings issued after the processing of a complaint on delay are inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural delay complaint inadmissible appeal Supreme Court ruling statutory limitation non-examination decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Act of 17 June 2004 on the complaint on the violation of the right of a party to have a case heard in court without unjustified delay (Dz.U. No. 179, item 1843)
Art. 8 para. 2 of the Act of 17 June 2004 on the complaint on the violation of the right of a party to have a case heard in court without unjustified delay
Art. 459 para. 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 430 para. 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 429 para. 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
art. 459 § 1 k.p.k

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text