Supreme Court dismissed appeal as facts and evidence assessment cannot be grounds for legal inconsistency claim.

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against a final labor court judgment regarding anniversary and severance pay. The plaintiff argued the lower court failed to consider that his disability pension resulted from a work accident, which should have triggered higher compensation under specific regulations. The court rejected this, ruling that appeals based on legal inconsistency cannot challenge factual findings or evidence evaluation, as the plaintiff did not properly notify the courts of the accident-related pension status.