II UZ 37/05
AI generated
Criminal appeal review does not include substantive claim assessment; only formal value declaration matters.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court set aside the lower court's dismissal of the cassation appeal regarding a work accident compensation claim. The appellant formally declared the appeal value based on medical costs, but the lower court rejected this as insufficient because the statutory law bases compensation on disability percentage rather than actual expenses. The court ruled that verifying the appeal value cannot involve assessing the merits or admissibility of the underlying claim, limiting the review to formal procedural requirements.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 3921 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 3933 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 3935 k.p.c.: The court's review of the appeal value declaration does not encompass the substantive assessment of the claim's admissibility or merit.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation appeal
appeal value declaration
substantive claim assessment
formal procedural requirement
work accident compensation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 3921 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 3933 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 3935 k.p.c.
Art. 130 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 39815 § 1 zdanie pierwsze
Art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 19 § 1 i § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 25 § 1 k.p.c.
Ustawa z dnia 30 października 2002 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym z tytułu wypadku przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
rozporządzenie Ministra Pracy i Polityki Społecznej z dnia 18 grudnia 2002 r.