Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZ 30/05 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court wrongly rejects it due to missing legal issue presentation.

Case Number II UZ 30/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland overturned the appellate court's dismissal of a social security appeal. The appellant argued that a court ruling following a review of a social security decision constituted a necessary circumstance under the Social Security Act, while the lower court rejected the appeal for failing to meet procedural requirements. The Supreme Court held that the appellant properly presented a legal issue requiring interpretation, thereby satisfying the statutory conditions for appeal review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 3933 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c.; Art. 3937 § 1 k.p.c. - An appeal is admissible if the appellant presents a specific legal issue requiring Supreme Court interpretation or identifies a serious discrepancy in case law, rather than merely repeating statutory formulations.

Keywords

AI generated
social security benefits appeal admissibility legal issue presentation Supreme Court jurisdiction procedural requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 3933 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c.
Art. 3937 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 k.p.c.
Art. 397 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39318 k.p.c.
Art. 118 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
art. 3933 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c
art. 3933 k.p.c
art. 393 k.p.c
art. 39318 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text