Supreme Court dismisses complaint on procedural delay caused by court's own scheduling adjustment after rejecting prior complaint.

The Supreme Court dismissed Alfred S.'s complaint alleging unreasonable delay in the appellate proceedings before the Poznań Court of Appeal. The appellant argued that the trial date was set eight months after the case files arrived, citing his health issues, while the court explained the delay resulted from the appellant's own prior complaint on delay which forced a transfer to the Supreme Court and subsequent return of files. The court held that the initial scheduling was timely and the rescheduling was objectively necessary due to the appellant's procedural actions, thus finding no violation of the right to a speedy trial.