Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZ 25/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lawyer submits only an estimated value without calculation method.

Case Number II UZ 25/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal because the lawyer failed to provide a calculated value for the subject matter of the dispute. Although the client later retracted a previously submitted hypothetical value, the initial submission of an unexplained estimate was deemed insufficient under the Civil Procedure Code. Consequently, the court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible due to the lack of a specific calculation method for the disputed amount.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 3935 k.p.c.; Art. 3933 § 2 k.p.c.: An appeal is inadmissible if the lawyer submits only an estimated value without specifying the method of calculation for the subject matter of the dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal inadmissibility subject matter value calculation method requirement estimated value insufficiency Civil Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 3935 k.p.c.
Art. 3933 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
Art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 3933 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c
art. 3921 § 1 k.p.c
art. 22 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text