III PK 14/05
AI generated
Dismissal of discrimination claim where dismissal for serious duty breach is not unequal treatment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal against a warning and suspension from medical duty shifts. The employee argued that excluding him from shifts for refusing to visit a patient constituted discrimination under labor law. The court held that such exclusion was a legitimate response to a serious breach of duties, not an impermissible discriminatory criterion.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 112, Art. 113 k.p.: Dismissal of an employee from duty shifts due to a serious breach of obligations does not constitute discrimination or unequal treatment.
Keywords
AI generated
labor law
discrimination
unequal treatment
serious breach
medical duty
employee obligations
cassation appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 112 k.p.
Art. 113 k.p.
Art. 393 k.p.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
art. 113 k.p
art. 112 k.p
art. 81 k.p
art. 1131 k.p