Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PK 14/05 AI generated

Dismissal of discrimination claim where dismissal for serious duty breach is not unequal treatment.

Case Number III PK 14/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal against a warning and suspension from medical duty shifts. The employee argued that excluding him from shifts for refusing to visit a patient constituted discrimination under labor law. The court held that such exclusion was a legitimate response to a serious breach of duties, not an impermissible discriminatory criterion.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 112, Art. 113 k.p.: Dismissal of an employee from duty shifts due to a serious breach of obligations does not constitute discrimination or unequal treatment.

Keywords

AI generated
labor law discrimination unequal treatment serious breach medical duty employee obligations cassation appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 112 k.p.
Art. 113 k.p.
Art. 393 k.p.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
art. 113 k.p
art. 112 k.p
art. 81 k.p
art. 1131 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text