Free leave granted after termination of employment is void due to lack of legal standing.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding compensation for wrongful termination following the invalid granting of free leave. The court found that the plaintiff was legally dismissed from his position as City Treasurer, rendering him no longer an employee entitled to leave under the Labor Code. Consequently, the mayor's act of granting free leave was void as it attempted to suspend the employment relationship of a non-employee, and the plaintiff's claim for damages was therefore rejected.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 174 § 1 k.p.; Art. 58 k.c.: An act granting free leave to a person whose employment relationship has been terminated is void because such a person cannot be an employee, and the employer lacks the authority to unilaterally suspend a non-existent employment relationship.