I UZ 76/04
AI generated
Social security increase claim for pre-decision period is not a separate action under Art. 21 k.p.c.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding the value of the subject matter in a social security dispute. The Court of Appeal rejected the appeal because the calculated value was below the 10,000 zł threshold, relying on Article 22 of the Civil Procedure Code. The Supreme Court clarified that requests for increased benefits for periods preceding the decision are not separate claims under Article 21, meaning the value must be determined differently.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 21 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 22 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 3921 § 1 k.p.c. A request for an increased pension for a period preceding the decision is not a separate claim under Article 21 of the Civil Procedure Code, and the value of the subject matter is determined according to Article 22.
Keywords
AI generated
social security benefits
pension increase claim
value of subject matter
cassation inadmissibility
separate claim requirement
civil procedure code
administrative procedure
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 21 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 22 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 3921 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 3933 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c.
Art. 39319 k.p.c.
Art. 397 k.p.c.
Art. 385 k.p.c.
§ 35 ust. 2 rozporządzenia z 7 lutego 1983 r. w sprawie postępowania o świadczenia emerytalno-rentowe
art. 21 k.p.c
art. 22 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI CO 5/58 (OSN 1958 nr 3, poz. 61)
III CZP 69/80 (OSNC 1981 nr 6, poz.101)
III CZP 72/02
Supreme Court allows cassation when applicant claims obvious legal violation or procedural invalidity under Art. 393-3 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c.
III CZP 69/80