I PZ 44/04
AI generated
Appeal dismissed: Lawyer's late request for judgment reasoning rejected under procedural time limits and statutory rules.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the lower court's rejection of a request for the judgment's reasoning. The appellant, represented by a lawyer, argued that a verbal request had been made at the hearing, but the court found no record of this in the protocol. The court ruled that the written request was filed after the statutory seven-day deadline and that a lawyer lacks the right to make verbal submissions under the relevant procedural code.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 466 k.p.c.; Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.; The right to verbally request the delivery of a judgment with reasoning is limited to parties acting without legal counsel, and such requests must be made within the statutory period.
Keywords
AI generated
procedural time limits
judgment reasoning delivery
legal counsel restrictions
verbal request invalidity
statutory deadline expiration
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 466 k.p.c.
Art. 387 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 328 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 9 k.p.c.
Art. 160 k.p.c.
art. 466 k.p.c
art. 387 § 3 k.p.c
art. 328 § 1 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIV CZ 18/00