Supreme Court ruled that the chief doctor's control right does not allow binding orders during the decision-making process.

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's judgment and remanded the case for retrial regarding a dispute over a doctor's work capacity assessment. The plaintiff argued that the chief doctor's authority to control medical decisions was violated, while the defendant contended that such oversight was necessary for quality assurance. The court held that the statutory provision granting control rights applies only to reviewing final decisions, not to issuing binding instructions during the decision-making process, thereby preserving the autonomy of the assessing physician.