Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I UK 196/04 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed cassation; fixed-term settlement rent cannot be changed after term expires.

Case Number I UK 196/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a former miner against his employer regarding compensation rent. The lower court had awarded rent based on a 1997 settlement agreement covering a specific period, which the plaintiff sought to extend beyond its expiration date. The court ruled that the settlement's fixed terms preclude any claim for rent modification after the agreed period, even if the employer continues voluntary payments. Consequently, the statutory provision cited by the plaintiff was deemed inapplicable to alter the settled agreement's scope.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 907 § 2 k.c.; Art. 444 § 2 k.c.; A fixed-term court settlement agreement cannot serve as a basis for requesting a change in the compensation rent amount after the agreed period has expired, even if the employer continues to pay voluntarily.

Keywords

AI generated
fixed-term settlement agreement compensation rent modification post-term payment obligation civil liability limitation employer voluntary payment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 907 § 2 k.c.
Art. 444 § 2 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 3931 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 907 § 2 k.c
art. 907 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 444 § 2 k.c
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 361 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text